Logotherapy, Psychology and Modern Society
Logotherapy, Psychology and Modern Society
Logotherapy,
the groundbreaking work of psychologist Dr. Viktor Frankl, author of Man’s
Search for Meaning, does not fit in with established notions of psychology.
Concurrently, establishment psychology supports and advances modern societal
trends. The psychological establishment, assuming the bright mantle of settled
science wrapped in the glittering cloak of received wisdom, holds the high
ground in the culture which marginalize Logotherapy. We shall study Logotherapy
and juxtapose its theory with that of its official Freudian opposite while
keeping in mind the fact that Viktor Frankl, who survived four years in Nazi concentration
camps, achieved a certain credibility that other psychological theorists did
not attain.
In his concentration camp
memoir, Man’s Search for Meaning, Frankl attributed his unlikely
survival in conditions of unimaginable horror to his well-developed
intellectual and spiritual life. He observed that by focusing on such external
factors as his love for his wife, fleeting observations of natural beauty such
as a sunset, and barely perceptible acts of defiance in the face of
totalitarian forces, he found meaning to his life and the inner strength to
live. Frankl survived while many stronger and younger men who perhaps lacked
similar internal resources did not. Frankl’s habit of focusing on meaning outside
of himself and beyond his indescribably miserable condition resulted in a
greater awareness of his surroundings which helped him to read the character
and intentions of those who might kill him at any moment.
Logotherapy is an applied practical social
science, one that helps the patient find solutions to psychological problems
with techniques that aid in finding meaning. The patient is able to tackle normal
but difficult situations related to suffering, loss, obsessive fear,
depression, insomnia, suicidal thoughts, and other conditions that have
contributed to neurosis in the patient. Logotherapy is based upon the premise
that by perceiving purpose, and by discovering meaning the individual, even those
experiencing extreme neurosis or psychosis, is
capable of determining how to cope and, in the process, how to advance the
course of their own life and destiny within the bounds of capability and
circumstance.
The obvious reason why the
psychological establishment rejects Logotherapy is because Logotherapy can
actually lead a patient toward resolving or solving a problem. This, quite
frankly, threatens the financial interests of psychotherapy which is, at the
end of the day, a cash cow. If the patient figures out how to cure himself, that
patient would no longer be inclined to spend a ton of money and waste
interminable hours over weeks, months, years, even decades in the therapist
chair. Indeed, with Logotherapy, conventional psychotherapy might no longer be
a lifestyle, as it is for such cultural luminaries as movie producer Woody
Allen. The therapist, practicing Logotherapy, would rather help the patient
solve or learn to cope with a real life problem. Having said this, it should be
noted that there are many talented and brilliant Freudian oriented
psychotherapists who care about and help their patients. This critique is
philosophical as opposed to one directed at individual professionals.
The psychological establishment
rejects Logotherapy, however, for reasons that transcend mere pecuniary
interests. Indeed, the rejection of Logotherapy has a philosophical component.
In Man’s Search for Meaning, Frankl
contrasts his concept of a will to meaning with Sigmund
Freud’s will to pleasure and Alfred
Adler’s will to power. All three men were practicing
psychologists around the same time in pre-World War II Vienna where, it has
been suggested, they each established three major psychological schools of
thought. While Frankl focused on the discovery of meaning as a choice, Freud
focused on the centrality of the subconscious mind and Adler focused on the
centrality of the individual as the primary source of existence.
Freud and Adler were both determinists
with Freud claiming that the human psyche was
pre-determined
by the ultimately unknowable subconscious mind as it was formed in the formative
years of infancy and early childhood. Freud was likely influenced in this
regard by the work of enlightenment philosopher Emmanuel Kant who viewed
reality as devided into two spheres, the conscious or nominal sphere which was
not real, and the unconscious or phenomenal sphere which was real but
unknowable. Adler’s will to power was likely influenced by the philosophy of
Frederich Nietzsche who developed a concept of will to power that he applied to
political leaders as well as to societies and nations.
Freud and Adler both viewed the
individual as a reactive animal, responding primarily to external stimuli and to
innate genetic biological factors. While Frankl acknowledged these factors as
influential on individual development, he nevertheless viewed environment and
genetic influence as existing outside the ability of the individual to exercise
free will and self-determination based upon individual educational, moral and
ethical development. Frankl’s personal experience in the Nazi concentration camps
led him to realize the ability of the individual to transcend and overcome extreme
external environmental factors. This same concentration camp experience led
Frankl to reject the deterministic genetic argument given that he witnessed first-hand
the Nazi crack-pot genetic race theories in action and he understood more fully
than most the real effects of their consequences.
Frankl believed that the individual was
capable, through self-reflection and self-knowledge, of changing direction of
his or her life. He believed that every person had an inner core of dignity.
In Man’s Search for Meaning, Frankl offers an example of a Nazi
camp doctor, who he described as satanic, but who was later changed into a
better person while held in the infamous Soviet Lubianka
prison.
Freudian psycology emphacizes the
pleasure principle, the idea that the purpose of life is to be happy. The work
of life, in this context, is to “find yourself” to use the old counter-culture
term. Freud may have drawn inspiration from the ancient Greek philosophical schools
of epicureanism and sophism which hold that whatever feels good is good and
that all of existence is based on the sensate. This belief, along with the
widely reported and accepted assumption that Freud was having an adulterous
affair with Mina Bernays, his wife’s sister, probably had a lot to do with his
obsession with sex. The Oedipus Complex, by which the child desires an incentuous
relationship with the parent of the opposite sex, constituted a major role in
Freud’s psychological theories.
Freud
viewed “polymorpheus pervisity,” sex with anyone, at any time, in any
combination, as an ultimate virtue and he viewed opposition to polymorpheus
pervisity a0s a form of psychological repression. This view would be advanced
by Soviet theoretician Alexandra Kollentai who wrote about winged as opposed to
unwinged eros. Winged eros, according to Kollentai, was sex connected to the
sacred, or sex connected to love, commitment, or meaning which she viewed as a bourjouis
affectation and, as such, a form of false consciousness. Kollentai viewed
unwinged eros, which she described as occurring when sex became as common and as
devoid of meaning as the act of drinking a glass of water, as a virtue.
Logotherapy
is a form of spsychtherapy that recognizes the obvious, that tension is a
normal and is often a positive dynamic of life, that tension can be harnessed
in positive ways when viewed in the context of meaning. The unnatural goal of
Freudian psycology, on the other hand, is equilibrium, a condition by which
tension has been eradicated which is impossible. Equalibriam, which is a
condition by which there is no tension, can only be achieved when the person is
dead.
In the
process of finding meaning as a response to the natural conditions associated
with tension, the individual is set on a cource of solving a problem. This
required the marshalling of all aspects of the human being, physical as well as
intellectual. A byproduct of working toward a goal, or a purpose, is a sense of
self-esteem which is a byproduct of such advancement. This is likewise the case
with a sense of happiness. These factors are thus not a goal, per se, but
rather they are a byproduct of experience and achievement.
Viktor
Frankl anchored his psychological theory on the importance of a sense of
responsibility. The successful sovereign individual finds meaning in life as a
result of developing an internal moral and ethical code, one based on reason as
well as faith. In Man’s Search for Meaning, Frankl suggests that the Statue
of Liberty, situated in New York harbor, be completed by a Statue of
Responsibility to be located in Los Angeles. Frankl derived his own moral and
ethical code from his study of science, by which he derived principles of
reason, and his faith, which he integrated with scientific knowledge.
Thus
Psycology today reflects the pleasure principle, whatever feels good is good,
and the psycology of politics reflects the Adlerian principle of the will to
power. Individuals sacrifice a besic objective understanding of right and wrong
in favor of satisfying whatever they precieve as pleasurable at the moment. In
the process, they lose their sense of meaning, they forget the past or the
future as they live only for the moment, and they ultimately forget who they
are.
This
is likewise the case with nations that operate on the principle of arbitrary
fiat power as opposed to limited representative responsibility which opens the
door to a deliberative expression of the national will. Both nations and
individuals would be well served to explore the psychological philosophy of
Viktor Frankl, a psycology that was forged in the hot irons of Aushwitz.