Review: Acorn-The Takeover of America

Renew America ^ | April 22, 2013 | Michael Gaynor 
Posted on 4/22/2013 4:17:51 PM by Charlesmoscowitz
Charles Moscowitz warns that ACORN's goal is to take over America in new book
By Michael Gaynor
Morse has lots to say, and what he says about ACORN needs to be common knowledge if the "fundamental transformation" of America that ACORN and Obama have been pursuing is to be stopped.
Charles Moscowitz is the author of books and columns that have been published in The Boston Globe, The Washington Times, The Providence Journal, the New Bedford Standard Times, WND, Newsmax and Front Page. Chuck Morse received the 2003 Communicator of the Year award from the National Right to Work Committee and was named a "Heavy 100" Radio Talk Host by Talkers Magazine. Moscowitz ran for Congress in 2004 against ACORN enabler Rep. Barney Frank in Massachusetts.
Moscowitz really gets it, and the title of his ACORN book – ACORN: The Takeover of America – is right on target.
Moscowitz: "...make no mistake, groups like ACORN celebrated the economic crunch because the financial meltdown, one in which the hard earned investments and equity built up by working Americans evaporated into thin air perhaps forever, one that caused massive layoffs and chronic unemployment, trillion dollar deficits, higher taxes and government control over business that was heretofore unthinkable, is precisely what ACORN and their ilk wanted and what they have been working toward for decades. The situation today is as a result of their deliberate and planned handiwork. They couldn't have been happier over the possibility that our economic system might implode. They revel over the possibility that the earnings and the equity that was achieved by working people, those of us who ACORN might call capitalist roadsters, might have forever vanished. Their ilk thrives in an atmosphere of uncertainty and perceived impending chaos as this condition presents an opportunity for them to invent new consciousness."
As I wrote on September 29, 2008 in "Blame Obama's ACORN for the Financial Crisis" (www.webcommentary.com/php/ShowArticle.php?id=gaynorm&date=080929):
"Don't expect the mainstream media to identify ACORN and its favorite community organizer and lawyer, rookie United States Senator and current Democrat presidential nominee Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. among the villains in the current financial crisis.
"But media bias does not change facts."
MSNBC urges us to lean forward, but we need to look back and learn. Morse focuses on plenty of facts that the liberal media establishment won't.
Barack Obama, the community organizer who first became the Senator from ACORN, then the President from ACORN and cleverly distanced himself in the general public perception from ACORN in 2009 and thus successfully ran for reelection, candidly spoke of "fundamentally transforming the United States of America" five days before Election Day 2008, but takeover is clearer.
If you have Kindle, go to http://amzn.com/B00BI237SG and get this book. It would be $2.99 well spent, or free if you have Amazon Prime.
The book description at Amazon.com states: "Chuck Morse analyses the history of the now defunct American radical group ACORN as a metaphor for the overall direction of America in the Obama years. ACORN developed an octopus-like apparatus of hundreds of secretive interlocking groups that were funded by the top 1% richest Americans and by billions in taxpayer money. Their agenda was a transfer of power from elected representatives to appointed bureaucrats with themselves playing the role of shock-troops and middleman as they fattened their coffers and engaged in illegal activities. With decades of investigations for voter registration fraud, ACORN was finally exposed by Operation Veritas in 2009. While they allegedly went out of business their infrastructure continues under other guises and their methodology and ideology lives on."
Atypically, the book is even better than its promotional description suggests.
Morse wrote in his book that "ACORN technically went out of business in 2009 after their criminality was exposed by Operation Veritas activists James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles" and "[m]ost of their taxpayer funded grants were cut off as a result of the scandal" and "evidence suggests that local branches of ACORN have continued to operate under other names." He did NOT indicate that ACORN is defunct.
Defunct means "no longer living, existing, or functioning," and the ACORN family or organizations (as ACORN founder and chief organizer from 1070 until 2008 put it) definitely is NOT defunct. See "The Rebranding of ACORN" (www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/acornspecialreport08222011.pdf). The 28-page report rightly concluded that (1) "[r]umors of ACORN's demise are completely false" because "ACORN lives on in the form of its affiliated organizations, such as Affordable Housing Centers of America, The Advance Group, The Black Institute, and Project Vote" and "ACORN's newly formed state organizations will continue to carry on...ACORN's work of organizing low- and moderate-income folks) ACORN's bankruptcy papers "appear to be incomplete and/or inaccurate" and "investigators believe these papers do not account for tens of millions of dollars in ACORN funds"; (3) "Project Vote is clearly going to continue to undermine the rule of law and the integrity of elections through fraudulent voter registrations" and "has retained voter registration fraud-tainted staff," so "the scandal of 2008 is bound to be repeated in 2012"; and (4) "ACORN leaders at both the state and national levels seem to have systematically violated numerous laws, and yet, the Obama Justice Department, likely due to the president's personal and political ties to the organization, refuses to investigate."
Morse rightly asserts: "As this nation enters into the second term of the Obama administration, former ACORN operatives are operating full speed ahead in most American cities. After the collapse of ACORN, they morphed into Occupy Wall Street and elements got out the vote for Obama and liberal Democrats in 2012. They consist of a growing cadre of idealistic young people, dedicated and well-meaning young people who are willing and eager to put in long and thankless workdays for very little pay. It's really too bad that this well intentioned idealism is directed not toward helping poor people become self-sufficient and proud members of our free society."
Exactly, and ACORN whistleblower Anita MonCrief appreciates that even better than Morse, because before the 2008 election she was one of those well-intentioned idealists and proudly voted for Obama in the utterly unrealistic expectation that he would be good for America, and then "evolved" as she watched what he actually proceeded to do and was disillusioned.
ACORN is subversive, and as ACORN expert Matthew Vadum warned in "Subversion Inc.: How Obama's ACORN Red Shirts are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers, "ACORN is still with us, doing its best to destroy American capitalism and democracy." (http://matthewvadum.blogspot.com/2011_06_01_archive.html).
In 2010 Vadum summarized the rebranding scheme as follows (www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/12/new-indictments-hit-crumbling-acorn/#ixzz2QvYecWQq):
"ACORN is hoping its latest public-relations ruse may give it an opportunity to take in untold millions of taxpayer dollars under cover of darkness just in time to influence upcoming elections.
"The ruse consists of ACORN's effort to pass off various state chapters as supposedly new groups independent of ACORN. In this re-branding charade, state chapters are pretending to break away from the national ACORN group and reincorporate themselves as independent organizations.
"At least four dummy nonprofit corporations have emerged from the re-branding process in recent months.
"They are the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, New York Communities for Change, New England United for Justice (Massachusetts) and Arkansas Community Organizations. All four groups operate out of ACORN offices and are run by ACORN staffers. The president of New England United for Justice, Maude Hurd, just happens to be the 20-year national president of ACORN.
"A senior ACORN staffer acknowledged the scam in an e-mail leaked to me:
'The truth is that it is hard for us to foresee [sic] any scenario where ACORN continues beyond the end of 2010 and some of us think it might not last that long," writes Nathan Henderson-James, director of ACORN's online campaigns, in an apparently authentic Feb. 22 e-mail.
'Last one to leave turn out the lights and wipe the server,' he writes at the end of the message.
"The message from Mr. Henderson-James was forwarded to me by various sources who obtained it from the Google listserv Townhouse, an invitation-only discussion forum run by Matt Stoller, senior policy adviser to progressive hero Rep. Alan Grayson, Florida Democrat.
"My sources advise me that the hundreds of high-level Democratic operatives, liberal activists and journalists who subscribe to the listserv are furious that Mr. Henderson-James' e-mail was leaked. Listserv members are said to be angrily accusing each other of being the leakers. This breach of security could be the end for Townhouse, one of the members reportedly said.
"ACORN Housing Corp., the best-funded of ACORN's affiliates, is also participating in the re-branding effort aimed at duping high-dollar charities and the public and allowing ACORN to continue eating your tax money. ACORN Housing has opted simply to change its name to Affordable Housing Centers of America Inc.
"There is no indication so far that ACORN intends to re-brand its voter-registration arm, Project Vote, which continues to operate."
Moscowitz has lots to say, and what he says about ACORN needs to become common knowledge if the "fundamental transformation" of America that ACORN and Obama have been pursuing is to be stopped.
© Michael Gaynor

Common Core Textbook Fraud

Common Core Textbook Fraud

By Charles Moscowitz

Author of American Testament - The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution - Keys to America's Future 

The Common Core Curriculum, which is being quietly implemented in public schools across the United States, is engaging in fraud in their teaching of the U.S. Constitution.  The Common Core textbook, United States History,published by the Amsco Division of Perfect Learning, does not include the actual text of the U.S. Constitution or the Bill of Rights within its pages, but rather it offers  “summaries” which consist of mendacious interpretations that reveal a political agenda. 

Whether one is liberal or conservative, all Americans should expect their children’s textbooks to be historically accurate. If our vulnerable children are being taught from textbooks that contain deliberate lies, then how can we expect our children to develop any sense of honesty?  

On the First Amendment, Common Core writes: 

Congress may make no laws that infringe upon a citizen’s right to freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.

Congress may not favor one religion over another (separation of church and state).

The actual text reads: 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the

freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a

redress of grievances. 

Besides slanting the text by leaving out the right to free exercise of religion, Common Core includes the term separation of church and state, even though this does not exist in the first amendment. 

On the Second Amendment, Common Core writes:  

The people have a right to keep and bear arms in a state militia. 

The actual text reads: 

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. 

This is a lie by omission as Common Core air-brushes out:  the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. 

This is only the tip of the Common Core iceberg and Chuck Morse intends on investigating further. Parents should take back the education of their children from this national cabal of educators. States and communities are being bribed to scuttle curriculum in favor of national standards.  

The democratic approach is for the parents to elect school board members who represent their values, and for those elected officials to then determine the best curriculum for their communities. Whether a local community is liberal or conservative, the citizens of that community, who pay for the public schools with their tax dollars, have a natural right to decide what is in the best interests of their own sons and daughters when it comes to education.  

We as a people should trust ourselves to govern ourselves especially when it comes something as critical as the education of our children. We should not trust this national bureaucracy of unaccountable appointees to know what is best for our children.

Examiner.com: commentary on Was Hitler a Leftist?

The right-wing news outlet and infamous conspiracy theory dumping ground WorldNetDaily has come to the unexpected (for WND) conclusion that President Obama is not a communist.

Don't get excited. They have actually concluded that he is a Nazi.

Radio host Chuck Morse shared his "findings" in an interview with WND's Bob Unruh.

As expected, the foundation of Morse's claim is his own personal re-imagining of the Nazis as a bunch of left-wing liberals.

"I'm not suggesting [Obama] is an anti-Semite," said Morse. "I'm not suggesting he's going to set up a Holocaust. But putting all that stuff aside, when you strip that away from historical Nazism and look at the political philosophy of Nazism, this is very much what Barack Obama is into."

For evidence of such, Morse cited Obama's use of themes like "hope" and "change" and support for "left-progressivism," which he argues "is largely to blame not only for the Nazi Holocaust but also for most of the programs of Holocaust, Genocide and Democide that have been implemented in the modern era."

Only in the sick fantasies of far-right extremists can Nazism be considered "left-progressive."

Even Hitler himself considered his position centrist:

Today our left-wing politicians in particular are constantly insisting that their craven-hearted and obsequious foreign policy necessarily results from the disarmament of Germany, whereas the truth is that this is the policy of traitors [...] But the politicians of the Right deserve exactly the same reproach. It was through their miserable cowardice that those ruffians of Jews who came into power in 1918 were able to rob the nation of its arms.

Unlike Chuck Morse, I trust you to recognize what present-day mantra most closely resembles this statement for yourself.

Cause of the Nazi Holocaust?

New book:  Was Hitler a Leftist?

On the Jewish Question - Karl Marx, anti-Semitism and the War against the West

The Counter-Fabians - Republicans in the Age of Obama

The Art and Science of American Money – How Our Money Is Created and Why It Matters

American Testament - The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution - Keys to America's Future  

Author Book Page:  Books by Charles Moscowitz  

Cause of the Nazi Holocaust?   

Conventional understanding of the cause of the Nazi Holocaust generally stops short by focusing only on the anti-Semitism of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, but such a focus, while valid, evades a more fundamental and instructive factor. 
In his new book, Was Hitler a Leftist?, Chuck Morse argues that Nazism was left-progressive and, specifically, that the leftist Soviet Union was the primary mentor of Nazism. 

“Philosophically both socialist experiments, Nazism or National Socialism, and Communism or International Socialism sprang from the same Marxist root,” argues Morse, who is also the author of The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism, published by WND Books in 2010. “Both regimes,” notes Morse, “resurrected the spirit of Robespierre and the 1793 French Reign of Terror. Both sought to overthrow the social order that promoted property, family, religion and individual identity itself with a collectivist agenda that called for a new and transformed mankind. The Nazi idea of transformation was biological, a Darwinian program of breeding toward the creation of an evolved species they called the ubermench. The Communist transformation was the outright abolition of all institutions that stood in the way of absolute equality.”

V.I. Lenin came to power in Russia (1917) where he established the first totalitarian regime since ancient times. Targeting specific groups for annihilation, Lenin presided over the unprecedented murders of 4-5 million human beings years before Hitler joined the Nazi Party. Lenin’s program of state-sponsored murder was carried out by the Cheka, his own secret army. The Checka would inspire the Nazi creation of the Gestapo decades later. There is evidence that the head of the Nazi Gestapo, Heinrich Mueller, reported to Lenin’s successor, Josef Stalin. Lenin established the Gulag system of concentration camps in 1918, a system imitated by the Nazis where theirs was overseen by the same alleged Soviet mole Mueller. 

There is evidence to suggest that Hitler’s right hand man, Martin Bormann, considered Hitler’s alter ego and Prime Minister, also reported to Stalin. 
Bormann was a major architect of the Holocaust against the Jews, and he was Adolf Eichmann’s superior. Nazi propaganda chief Josef Goebbels had been a Marxist in his formative years, and his methods of propaganda exactly mirrored the Soviet style of disinfrmatzia. Was Hitler a Leftist? includes evidence indicating that Hitler likely started out as a Marxist and possibly was a Communist. The founding platform of the Nazi Party, drafted under Hitler’s influence, reads like a communist manifesto.

Lenin’s liquidations and genocides were largely covered up by the western establishment which either turned a blind eye or justified Soviet terror as, to paraphrase pro-Soviet New York Times reporter Walter Duranty, cracking a few eggs to make an omelet. Most average Europeans, particularly those in Eastern and central Europe, were fully cognizant of the Soviet terror and of Soviet attempts to export their revolution. Communist revolutionary Benito Mussolini, reacting to the revulsion Europeans felt toward the greatest terror to have darkened their continent since the bubonic plague, responded by fashioning a Third Way. His movement preserved enough of a fig-leaf of capitalism and western notions of democracy to offer him an opportunity to take power in Italy and move his nation to the left. 

Understanding the leftist nature of Nazism, the collaboration between the Nazis and the Soviet Communists which led to the formal alliance between the two socialist behemoths that triggered World War II and an examination of the post-war Soviet directed cover-up of the alliance is instructive, not only in terms of understanding the Holocaust, but also of understanding our own times. 

Was Hitler a Leftist?

Was Hitler a Leftist?

The Chabad Lubavitch Hassidic movement has requested that Yad Vashem recognize Nazi Admiral Wilhelm Canaris as a Righteous Gentile. Chief of the Abwehr, the Nazi intelligence service, Canaris played a key role in saving the lives of the Chabad Rebbe Yitzhak Yosef Schneerson and his family along with an estimated 500 Jews from the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943 according to numerous testimonies. Canaris has also been credited with using his position to convince Spanish Dictator Francisco Franco to stay out of the war and to stop a kidnapping and murder plot ordered by Hitler against Pope Pius XII and Italian King Victor Emanuel II after the 1943 Nazi occupation of Rome.

Chuck Morse, radio talk show host and author of the recently released book  Was Hitler a Leftist? and of the previously released book The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism published by WND Books contends that the refusal of Yad Vashem and the Holocaust Studies establishment to recognize Wilhelm Canaris as a Righteous Gentile is due to their concern that such recognition might open a can of worms on the Franklin D. Roosevelt Administration and its conduct during World War II.

Admiral Canaris met with American Ambassador to Turkey George H. Earle in Istanbul, 1942. Speaking on behalf of an impressive array of high ranking German military and civilian officials he offered to have Hitler surrounded in his bunker, arrested, and sent to the west for trial as a war criminal. He stated that an armistice with a German provisional government would include the complete withdrawal of Germany from occupied Europe and a holding of a line against Soviet aggression by Germany on the eastern front with the help of the allies.

At the time Allan Dulles, who was the OSS chief in Switzerland, was reporting to FDR on the activities of these same anti-Nazi Germans who were looking for allied support. Dulles noted, in his book Germany’s Underground published in 1947, that the Allies supported every anti-Nazi group in occupied Europe during the war except for the German anti-Nazis. Earle, Dulles and others were ignored by the Roosevelt Administration. In his book, Dulles names the anti-Nazi conspirators and they included such prominent German figures as General Ludwig Beck, Carl Frederick Gerderler, Ulrich von Hassell, Johannes Popitz, General Kurt von Hammerstein and General Erwin von Witzleben.  Indeed, in March 1947, the New York Times broke the story with the headline: Full Story of anti-Hitler plot shows that Allies refused to Assist. Why then did FDR refuse to help these anti-Nazi Germans end the war as they were reaching out as early as 1943?

Incontrovertible evidence now exists that includes congressional testamony from several reliable witnesses, the recently de-classified Verona decryptions which were secret communications between the Soviets and their American agents during the war and the opening of Soviet Archives after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that FDR was virtually surrounded by pro-Soviet spies, dupes, operatives and agents of influence. These included his virtual co-president Harry Hopkins, Assistant Secretary of State Alger Hiss, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Harry Dexter White, White House economic advisor Laughlin Currie, foreign policy advisor Laurence Duggan, Virginias Frank Coe and many others marbled throughout virtually every department of the Roosevelt Administration including the OSS and the Office of War Information. Harry Hopkins and Laughlin Curry lived in the White House just down the hall from FDR. Meanwhile his wife Eleanor wrote published paeans to “Uncle Joe” Stalin.

Archival evidence indicates that the Soviet’s wanted the war to continue long enough for them to conquer Eastern Europe and in order for Germany to be utterly destroyed or “pastoralized” which was called for in the Morgenthau Plan which was actually written by Soviet spy Harry Dexter White. The Soviets were also clamoring for a “second front” in France in order to deflect the allies out of Italy and the Balkans which was too close to Russia.

Yad Vashem, in their justification for refusing to recognize Wilhelm Canaris as a Righteous Gentile, claimed that Canaris was too involved in the Nazi war effort at too high a level yet had Canaris been successful in his effort to end the war in 1943 hundreds of thousands of Allied lives would have been saved, the Holocaust would have been stopped thus saving possibly millions of Jews, the extermination of the Hungarian Jews would not have happened, and the Soviets would have been stopped dead in their tracks thus saving millions more from the scourge of decades of Communism. Now is the time to recognize the valiant and courageous actions of the Righteous Gentile Wilhelm Canaris, who was tortured and executed a week before the collapse of the Nazi regime. Now is also the time for a forthright rendering of the history of World War II.

New book:  Was Hitler a Leftist?

On the Jewish Question - Karl Marx, anti-Semitism and the War against the West

The Counter-Fabians - Republicans in the Age of Obama

The Art and Science of American Money – How Our Money Is Created and Why It Matters

American Testament - The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution - Keys to America's Future  

Author Book Page:  Books by Charles Moscowitz 

Darwin Day

TOPIC

Darwin Day 

GUEST

Charles Moscowitz

CONTACT

617-271-5044, charlesmoscowitz@gmail.com   

Charles Moscowitz CREDS

Former Host on the IRN/USA Radio Network, Charles Moscowitz is the author of several books, including:

The Apostles of Evolution – The Practical Result of the Evolutionary Faith

which may be purchased at http://amzn.com/B00B0O6AJU)

Other books by Charles Moscowitz may be purchased at  http://t.co/oxZNlr94Fw

Published in The Boston Globe, The Washington Times, The Providence Journal, The New Bedford Standard Times, WND, Newsmax and Front Page, Moscowitz challenged Rep. Barney Frank in Massachusetts for Congressional Seat in 2004

Darwin Day 

February 12 is “Darwin Day” as observed by the cult followers of the British naturalist Charles Darwin. 

It’s been over a hundred years since the publication of Darwin's seminal book: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life and there is still not a single shred of evidence that his racist theory of breeding is true.

What then, exactly, was Darwin’s creation theory?

Darwin’s theory holds that breeding by superior members of a given species with each other, or what Darwin called “random selection,” results in the evolution of a new and superior species. In this process the inferior or the “weaker” members of the given species either die off or are annihilated.

Darwin was a devout follower of Thomas Malthus who coined the idea of scarcity, a materialist theory which held that since the earth was a finite system its resources would run out unless the lesser members of the human species were either reduced or eliminated.

Darwin's theory was further developed by his cousin and collaborator Francis Galton who established the “science” of Eugenics which held that the process of natural selection should be replaced by planned selection in order to create a new and superior species.

Galton’s idea was embraced by Hitler and his practice of lebensraum which were collective communes of women chosen as superior specimens to breed with males who were members of the racially select SS. They were to give birth to more evolved offspring. This would stand to reason if one accepts Darwin’s crackpot idea as scientific fact. 

Hitler’s biological experiments, profoundly influenced by Darwin, would indeed be moral if mankind, in order to effect the survival of the fittest, would have develop a stronger and smarter strain. The Darwinian moral imprimatur was applied by the Nazis to their social experiment of isolating and in certain cases annihilating those they deemed to be members of inferior species who they viewed as consuming the earth's limited resources, useless eaters, those who were threatening the biological progress of the human race.

As we observe Darwin Day we might also thank Darwin for influencing the social theories of his contemporary social scientist Karl Marx who wanted to dedicate his Magnum Opus “Das Kapital” to Darwin. Marx transplanted Darwin’s biological theory of evolving the species in order to advance the human race to a social construct that had society evolving in stages, first feudalism, then capitalism, then socialism and finally communism where the entire planet would become one gigantic world-wide ant colony.

Yes, indeed, Darwin and his theory of breeding toward the evolution of a superior human species, an Ubermench, or toward an evolved utopian society remains all the rage with the fashionable set to this day who long for "change." And dare, just dare, to try to publicly question the validity of Darwin's theory, the crown jewell of the change-agents. Watch out! You might be relegated to the status of an inferior species.

PROFILE:

Charles Moscowitz is the host of "Moscowitz" on YouTube and syndicates. He is the author of books as well as columns that have been published in The Boston Globe, The Washington Times, The Providence Journal, the New Bedford Standard Times, WND, Newsmax and Front Page. Moscowitz received the 2003 Communicator of the Year award from the National Right to Work Committee and was named a "Heavy 100" Radio Talk Host by Talkers Magazine. Moscowitz ran for Congress in 2004 against Rep. Barney Frank in Massachusetts.

Charles Moscowitz speaks on several topics covered in his books which are published on Amazon Kindle.

Those books may be reviewed and purchased at http://t.co/oxZNlr94Fw. 

Blog Archive

441-450 of 1467 

	The Ganja Godfather		Charles Moscowitz Live Stream and Podcast	0	104	4/15/15
	A Great Day for Obama		Charles Moscowitz Live Stream and Podcast	0	110	4/12/15
	Some Fun Tonight! The Beatles American Tour 1964-1966		Charles Moscowitz Live Stream and Podcast	0	69	4/9/15
	Worst decision in history? Polygamy conservative?		Charles Moscowitz Live Stream and Podcast	0	51	4/8/15
	'Guardians' abducting the elderly, Democracy coming to Communist Cuba?		Charles Moscowitz Live Stream and Podcast	0	39	4/7/15
	What Made FDR and the Greatest Generation Truly Great		Charles Moscowitz Live Stream and Podcast	0	418	4/6/15
	The Lost Temple of Israel, Obamacare update		Charles Moscowitz Live Stream and Podcast	0	84	4/2/15
	The Culture War, left-wing anti-Semitism		Charles Moscowitz Live Stream and Podcast	0	814	4/1/15
	The Moral Arc, Assault on Religious Freedom		Charles Moscowitz Live Stream and Podcast	0	605	3/31/15
	Pakistan Politics, Military Drill in US States?