A Whig Manifesto

• HOME
• NEWS CENTER
• BLOG

Login

Create Account

United States

Politlical Commentator Charles Moscowitz

Researches  New Third Party: WHIGS

Charles Moscowitz is a seasoned radio talk show host featured on CyberstationUSA.com’s “Fairness Radio with Chuck Morse & Patrick O’Heffernan”; he authored THE NAZI CONNECTION TO ISLAMIC TERRORISM and has contributed to major papers and magazines on political topics.

• 

This is the fastest growing third-party in America.

Boston, MA (PRWEB) May 23, 2012

Radio talk show host Chuck Morse, a conservative political commentator, was intrigued that so many servicemen and women, returning to a federal government shutdown by party one-up-manship, were forming their own political party by turning to a philosophy around since the Boston Tea Party: They are reviving the WHIGs.

“Modern WHIGs support the US Constitution’s guarantee to a balanced government, and not just the balance between executive, legislative and judicial branches of power, but also between the federal government and the states,” says Mr. Morse, who examines the issues in detail in a newly published book titled A WHIG Manifesto, available through Trineday Publishers.

The Constitution clearly says: Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

“The Whigs of today are concerned over a turnover of governing authority from elected officials to unaccountable appointees, bureaucrats, judges, and international bodies,” said Mr. Morse.

“The WHIGs goal is to preserve American sovereignty and security, a philosophy that is neither left nor right. The Whigs recognize that the most natural and fundamental balance in government resides in the balance between the government and the sovereign citizen.”

This is why the WHIGs support the right of the individual to worship in public, to keep and bear arms, and to maintain the maximum level of control by the individual and the family over life, liberty, property, and destiny, and to have their civil and equal rights strongly protected, according to the Manifesto.

While the WHIGs support a vigorous national government that invests in national infrastructure, protects domestic industry and labor, regulates national financial and banking institutions and issues debt-free currency, the Whigs also respect the prerogative of the states to regulate on such social questions as the definition of marriage and other family issues, says Mr. Morse.

“The WHIGs have championed civil rights on the national level, the right to equal justice under the law, since the days of the WHIG Administration of Abraham Lincoln. Yet regarding specific policies of welfare, education, health care, affirmative action, abortion, birth control, and other social questions, the Whigs trust the citizens of the states, and their elected state representatives, to render public policies that are suitable,” he said. “This is the fastest growing third-party in America!”

Mr. Morse is available for interview about why Americans have a legitimate third-party choice. Contact:
Kris Millegan, publisher, Trineday Books (800) 556-2012
Chuck Morse (617) 271-5044
C. Brylski (504) 897-6110

Related links: 

•     http://trineday.com/paypal_store/product_pages/9781936296934-A_Whig_Manifesto/index.html
•     http://www.modernwhig.org
•     http://awhigmanifesto.blogspot.com

On the Jewish Question - Karl Marx, anti-Semitism and the War against the West

Contact Charles Moscowitz: (617) 271-5044 charlesmoscowitz@gmail.com

New book:  On the Jewish Question - Karl Marx, anti-Semitism and the War against the West

The Counter-Fabians - Republicans in the Age of Obama

The Art and Science of American Money – How Our Money Is Created and Why It Matters

American Testament - The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution - Keys to America's Future 
Was Hitler a Leftist?

Book sweeps aside last Nazi Holocaust Taboo - The anti-Semitic influence of Karl Marx on the Nazis and the Left

With utter disregard for political correctness, author and radio talk show host Charles Moscowitz documents a primary cause of the anti-Semitism of Hitler and the Nazis leading to the Holocaust against the Jews of Europe. He documents the influence of Karl Marx on Hitler and the formation of Nazi political ideology.

 On the Jewish Question - Karl Marx, anti-Semitism and the War against the West examines Marx infamous 1844 tract “On the Jewish Question” which calls for the “disintegration” of Judaism, a religion that Marx claimed was based upon “practical need, self-interest, huckstering and money.”

Moscowitz Marx' attack on Judaism a indirect assault on Christianity, America, and on essentially all that is natural and positive to human nature. Marx called human attributes that foster freedom “Jewish” while claiming that the annihilation of Judaism would rid society of “false consciousness” set up as a conspiracy to exploit people. He claimed that Judaism was the main roadblock standing in the way of his Utopian collectivist vision of the world as one gigantic ant colony.

Marx ideas about Judaism would be embraced by the Nazis and would be unwittingly internalized by generations of leftists causing them to hold a malevolent hostility to America, Christianity, capitalism and the western democracies.

Moscowitz contends that an understanding of the Marxist underpinnings of Nazism is relevant to understand of the cause of the Holocaust as well as important in terms of understanding present political currents that contribute to an emerging unholy alliance between the far left and radical Islamic Jihad.

Moscowitz criticizes the narrow focus of Holocaust and genocide education, argues that an understanding of the nuances that contributed to the Holocaust gives real teeth to the slogan “never again.”

The Silence of the Shoah Establishment

The Silence of the Shoah Establishment

Charles Moscowitz, the author of On the Jewish Question - Karl Marx, anti-Semitism and the War against the West, is available to discuss this topic. 

On the Jewish Question - Karl Marx, anti-Semitism and the War against the West By Charles Moscowitz  (1 customer review) Kindle Price: $2.99

 

This book responsibly and carefully addresses an aspect of the rise of Nazism and the implementation of the Holocaust against the Jews of Europe that has been viewed as taboo due to false portrayals by anti-Semites including the Nazis themselves. Indeed, this one aspect of the roots of Nazism has been virtually airbrushed out of public discourse. Chuck Morse contends that there will never be a fully integrated understanding of the Holocaust until the subject raisedin this book is broached. Indeed, Morse contends, the blackout of research covered in this book is a crime against the memory of the six million Jewish victims of the Nazi Holocaust and is a disservice to the letter and the spirit of the slogan “never again.”

The politically incorrect aspect of Nazism researched and documented in this book are the influence that Karl Marx had on the development of Nazism and on Adolf Hitler. This book republishes Marx’s hateful tract On the Jewish Question which should be listed in the same infamous pantheon of anti-Semitic hate literature as Mein Kampf and as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. This book documents the Marxist core of Nazism

In On the Jewish Question, Karl Marx wrote the following:

What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need,  self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew?  Huckstering. What is his worldly God?  Money.

Marx wrote about false consciousness which he applied to Judaism; false consciousness that he claimed was created by exploiters. He believed that such false consciousness could be replaced by a new paradigm that would advance human society toward the ultimate and utopian goal, the collective world ant-colony. But in order to accomplish his Utopian goals, Marx wrote that Judaism would have to be made impossible.

Marx sought to replace positive human traits such as Self-interest, which is the natural desire of the human being to control his own life and destiny,  Huckstering, which is the natural need for the human being to trade goods, services and ideas in an atmosphere of freedom, and Money, which allows people a means to store value and which is the basis of private property, with Communism. This book  examines the similarities between Marxism and the Nazi theory of the Ubermench. 

Many liberals are made uncomfortable by the fact that by 1920 Lenin and the Bolsheviks had already murdered 4-5 million of their own people for political reasons before Hitler and the Nazis had formed, and these facts were well known to them. Indeed, the world turned a blind eye or even supported the Bolsheviks as progressive in the face of unprecedented atrocity.  Lenin is still viewed as a visionary in some circles. 

Moscowitz states: I have been fascinated by the Holocaust since as a child I heard my grandparents and uncles and aunts discuss the topic and the people that they knew who were murdered. I wondered how this could have happened. I have searched for answers ever since. It is my quest to leave no stone unturned get  to the truth, and at this point in human history, after subsequent Communist genocides which took place after World War II and with the genocidal forces that the State of Israel faces, I would hope that others would be courageous enough to join me in my quest. 

Barney Frank and the Law of Unintended Consequences: How the Frank Amendment Helped Terrorists get Legal Visas

Barney Frank and the Law of Unintended Consequences: How the Frank Amendment Helped Terrorists get Legal Visas  I DID NOT WANT TO GET INTO THIS TODAY, A DAY IN WHICH MY FELLOW BOSTONIAN S HAVE BEEN MURDERED AND ARE SUFFERING TERRIBLE INJURIES FROM THE TERRORIST BOMBING OF THE BOSTON MARATHON, BUT I AM COMPELLED TO DO SO BY THE REMARKS OF THE DISGRACED FORMER MASSACHUSETTS CONGRESSMAN BARNEY FRANK. RESPONDING TO THE ATTACK, FRANK TOLD MSNBC THAT TAXES WEREN'T HIGH ENOUGH AND THAT REPUBLICANS HAVE SOMETHING AGAINST PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES.  FRANK SPONSORED A BILL THAT STRUCK DOWN THE EXCLUSION CLAUSE FROM THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT IN 1989. HE DID THIS TO HELP LEFT-WING POET GABRIEL GARCIA MARQUEZ, THE AUTHOR OF “MY MELANCHOLY WHORES,” WHO HAD BEEN DENIED A VISA BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT BECAUSE OF HIS TIES TO FIDEL CASTRO, TO ENTER THE COUNTRY SO HE COULD SELL BOOKS TO ELITIST LEFT-WING COLLEGE STUDENTS. AS A MEMBER OF CONGRESS, FRANK COULD HAVE SPONSORED MARQUEZ TRIP BUT INSTEAD HE SPONSORED A LAW THAT MADE IT POSSIBLE FOR ALL VISA APPLICANTS TO ENTER THE COUNTRY LEGALLY UNLESS THERE WAS “PROOF” THEY HAD BEEN INVOLVED IN “TERRORIST ACTIVITIES” A STANDARD THAT WOULD BE VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR OUR IMMIGRATION AND EMBASSY OFFICIALS TO PROVE. GERALD POSNER, IN HIS BOOK “WHY AMERICA SLEPT" WROTE:  THAT FRANK HAD “LED A SUCCESSFUL EFFORT TO AMEND THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT SO THAT MEMBERSHIP IN A TERRORIST GROUP WAS NO LONGER SUFFICIENT TO DENY A VISA....UNDER FRANK’S AMENDMENT, WHICH SEEMS UNTHINKABLE POST–SEPT. 11, A VISA COULD ONLY BE DENIED IF THE GOVERNMENT COULD PROVE THAT THE APPLICANT HAD COMMITTED AN ACT OF TERRORISM.” FORMER CIA DIRECTORS JAMES WOOLSEY AND GEORGE TENET CLAIMED THAT CONGRESS HAD OPENED THE FLOODGATES TO TERRORISTS. AFTER THE PASSAGE OF OVER A DOZEN SEPARATE FRANK AMENDMENTS, TERRORISTS FLOODED INTO THE COUNTRY WITH LEGAL VISAS INCLUDING THE 19 SEPTEMBER 11TH HIJACKERS  ACCORDING TO THE CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY OF TERRORISM EXPERT STEVEN EMERSON. THE SEPT. 11 COMMISSION REPORT (PAGE 237) STATES THAT “THE MUSCLE HIJACKERS BEGAN ARRIVING IN THE UNITED STATES IN LATE APRIL 2001. IN MOST CASES THEY TRAVELED IN PAIRS ON TOURIST VISAS AND ENTERED THE UNITED STATES IN ORLANDO OR MIAMI, FLORIDA; WASHINGTON, D.C.; OR NEW YORK.  INTERNATIONAL LAW AND CUSTOM HAS ALWAYS RECOGNIZED THE NATURAL RIGHT OF THE SOVEREIGN NATION TO DENY A VISA TO A SUSPECTED FOREIGN  ENEMY. AMERICA TRADITIONALLY DENIED VISAS TO FORMER NAZIS, RACISTS, ANTI-SEMITES AND OTHERS ESPOUSING IDEOLOGIES THAT RUN CONTRARY TO AMERICAN VALUES. FRANK THOUGHT IT WAS PROGRESSIVE TO REMOVE THAT RIGHT, A RIGHT THAT IS AS FUNDAMENTAL AS THE RIGHT OF AN INDIVIDUAL OR OF A FAMILY TO DENY ENTRANCE TO A PERSON INTO THEIR PRIVATE HOME. IT IS DIFFICULT TO  FATHOM THE DAMAGE THE FRANK AMENDMENT DID TO OUR SECURITY AND IT'S HARD TO COMPREHEND THE UTTER STUPIDITY OF FRANK'S ADVOCACY.  FRANK LEFT THIS COUNTRY VULNERABLE TO ENEMY ATTACK. WHILE MOST OF THE FRANK LEGISLATION WAS DONE AWAY WITH AFTER THE CATASTROPHE OF 9/11, THE QUESTION REMAINS IN TERMS OF HOW MUCH OF IT IS STILL IN EFFECT. ARE OUR IMMIGRATION OFFICIALS STILL AFRAID TO DENY A VISA FOR FEAR OF BEING ACCUSED OF DISCRIMINATION?  WILL IT TURN OUT TO BE THE CASE THAT THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBERS HAD LEGAL VISAS? WERE THEY FRANK AMENDMENT TERRORISTS? TIME WILL TELL.

Elizabeth Warren: Corrupt Corporate Hack

The former Harvard Professor who received tenure by abusing affirmative action, the former corrupt corporate hack and insider fixer Elizabeth Warren has transformed herself, since being elected to the US Senate, into a shameful Democratic Party stooge. There she stood, on the day after the atrocity at the Boston Marathon, at a press conference where she took the opportunity to praise President Obama profusely and to let us all know what a wonderful job he is doing. No mention of the three people brutally murdered in the bombing. No mention of the over a dozen people fighting for their lives who had their limbs blown off. Barely a mention of the incredible work being done by law enforcement at all levels or the brave and selfless work of Boston volunteers who rose to the occasion. I’m sure President Obama is doing a great job but even he must have cringed with embarrassment at this level of blatant butt kissing.

Since being elected, the former corrupt corporate lawyer, who got a big check from Dow Chemical to stop women who were trying to get a little  justice after being contaminated with toxic chemicals leeching out of their breast implants, has focused on raising dough for Democratic candidates. In one of her first acts in Congress, she set up a PAC to raise money for Democratic congressional candidates to run against her Republican colleagues in Congress. While there is nothing wrong with raising money for Democrats or Republicans it is obviously unseemly for a sitting US Senator to be doing it and to then expect to conduct the business required by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and by the nation by working with Republicans to get things done.

At least she doesn’t appear to have put her hand in the till yet which was not the case when she was flipping foreclosed-on mortgages back home in Oklahoma City. Back then she made bundles of money turning people out of their homes, including a woman with children whose husband was serving in Iraq, people who fell late on their mortgages, so she could make a quick buck. No doubt she was working with the banks, members of the same industry that she smugly and sanctimoniously railed against during her campaign.

Oh yes, the champion of the little guy, the hero of those who are just seeking a place at the table, also took big checks from an insurance company trying to dodge claims from victims of asbestos cancer and from a manufacturer trying to screw their union employees.  The inside fixer also got a tidy sum from you and I, the working taxpayer, for setting up the ironically named Consumer Protection Bureau, ironic given Warren’s stellar record of protecting consumers. President Obama had enough sense to pass her over when it came time to appoint a head of that new agency. He probably knows some things about her that the rest of us don’t.

This brings me to my fellow Massachusetts voters. I understand that Massachusetts is a liberal state that elects liberals to office but I expected more discernment even from my fellow Massachusetts citizens, even though they are liberal. I expected them to at least notice the enormous sums of corporate cash pouring into her campaign from out of state, more corporate moolah for a state candidate than any in Massachusetts history. But, alas, they elected this consummate liar, this faker who was getting over 300K per year and a free house from Harvard to teach one class. Now we’ll have to listen to her drone on incessantly about campaign finance reform and the millionaires and billionaires. Thus, for the next six years Massachusetts will have to endure disgrace and humiliation as we become a laughing-stock. For one, I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to my fellow Americans on behalf of my state for inflicting this travesty of a Senator on the rest of the country. 

Islamo-Communism The Communist Connection to Islamic Terrorism

Islamo-Communism The Communist Connection to Islamic Terrorism by Charles Moscowitz Kindle Price: $2.99 Auto-delivered wirelessly    In the aftermath of the radical Islamo-Communist terror bombing of Boston, and a subsequent spate of near misses and evacuations across the country, it is appropriate to look back and consider the measures that were taken in similar circumstances in 1919 by A. Mitchell Palmer, the liberal Democratic Quaker Pacifist Attorney General who served in the liberal Democratic administration of President Woodrow Wilson. Following the 1917 Bolshevik coup in Russia, pro-Soviet anarchists launched a campaign of bombing and assassination against American officials, judges, and prominent citizens. On August 20, 1918, Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin issued a fatwa against the United States of America in his “Letter to American Workers.” Lenin called on his American sleeper cells to “play an exceptionally important role as uncompromising enemies of American imperialism” by launching a “civil war against the bourgeoisie.” April 28, 1919, a Bolshevik bomb was dismantled at the home of Seattle Mayor Ole Hanson. The next day, a Bolshevik bomb ripped the hands off of an employee of Georgia Senator Thomas Hardwick and severely burned his wife. A few days later, on May Day, 1919, 34 bombs were intercepted before reaching their targets which included such leading figures as Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, North Carolina Senator Lee S. Overman, Utah Senator William H. King, Postmaster General Albert Berlson, and John D. Rockefeller. On that same day, coordinated violent and seditious riots were launched in several American cities including Boston. The next day a bomb ripped through a municipal building in Brownsville Pennsylvania. On June 2, 1919 eight American cities were bombed simultaneously by Soviet sympathizing anarchists. Bombs exploded at the homes of Boston Judge A. F. Hayden and at the Newton, Massachusetts, home of State Representative Leland Powers. A bomb was defused at the office of Cleveland Mayor Harry L. Davis and two bombs exploded in the Squirrel Hill neighborhood of Pittsburgh, one next to the home of Federal Judge J. Thomson and the other next to the home of immigration official W.W. Sibray. In New York City, the home of Judge Charles C. Nott was bombed killing night patrolman William Goshner and an unidentified man in what the New York Times referred to as an “infernal killing machine.” In Philadelphia, the Our Lady of Victory Roman Catholic Church and the Frankfort Arsenal were bombed. On that day bombs exploded at the homes of prominent citizens in Patterson and East Orange New Jersey. Most significantly from a political standpoint, a huge bomb ripped through the front of the Georgetown home of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer. The terrorist planting the bomb was killed when he tripped running from the scene. Palmer and his young family were not hurt in the assassination attempt. The massive explosion caused windows to shatter at the neighboring home of Palmer’s close friend and political associate, Under Secretary of the Navy Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who ran out to help. Palmer acted swiftly by establishing a special unit to investigate the terrorists and he put 24-year-old liberal Democrat J. Edgar Hoover in charge. The special unit, which would become the FBI, proceeded to round up more than 10,000 suspected alien terrorists over the next seven months. By January 1920, 247 alien terrorists had been deported. Those who could not be deported due to insufficient evidence were released. Nine months later, September 1920, pro-Soviet anarchists bombed Wall Street killing 40 commuters and injuring more than 400 in an explosion that would make the Boston Marathon bombing look like a fire-cracker in comparison. The street was littered with dismembered corpses and puddles of blood. The pro-Soviet jihadists were secular radicals, most of who had recently emigrated from Europe, who were trying to destabilize America with a new kind of warfare. They called their terrorist acts the “propaganda of the deed.” Their garden of Allah was socialism and anarchy. The Wilson administration broke the back of the terrorist infrastructure and the result was relative peace and security for several generations. Contrary to the propaganda of the terrorist sympathizers, this was accomplished lawfully and with an impressive degree of restraint. Alien terrorists and their alien enablers were deported, the threat was suppressed, and civil liberties were preserved. The Wilson administration response to the emergency went a long way toward sparing this country from the type of chaos and violence that plagued Europe at the time, violence and chaos that contributed to the enthronement of National Socialism in Germany. President Wilson articulated his counterterrorism policy in his December 1919 message to Congress: “Let us be frank about this solemn matter, the evidences of the world-wide unrest which manifest themselves in violence throughout the world bid us pause and consider the means to be found to stop the spread of this contagious thing before it saps the very vitality of the nation itself.” The Islamo-Communists of today are more dangerous than were the Anarchist- Communists of 1919-1920 because of their indiscriminate terror tactics. Rather than targeting specific people for murder, as did the Anarchist-Communists, the Islamo- Communists kill as many Americans as they possibly can as was the case at the Boston Marathon. Wilson recognized the subversive threat the alien anarchists posed to America and he chose to crush the conspiracy in an entirely lawful manner. No alien has a right to reside in the United States, or in any sovereign state according to norms of international law and custom. Like the FBI of 1919-1920, the FBI today should roundup aliens suspected of involvement in the terrorist conspiracy and, after a process of determining the nature of the involvement, those found to have been involved in aiding or abetting terrorism should be swiftly deported.

What Is the Federal Reserve?

TOPIC

What  IS the Federal Reserve?

GUEST:
Charles Moscowitz

Contact: (617) 271-5044  charlesmoscowitz@gmail.com 

The Art and Science of American Money – How Our Money Is Created and Why It Matters

What IS the Federal Reserve? 

The New York Times front page article: In Tug of War Over New Fed Leader, Some Gender Undertones (7/26)focuses irrelevantly on the question of the gender of a potential Chairman of the Fed, soon to be chosen by President Obama, as Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke prepares to step down at the end of this year.

But what, exactly, is the Federal Reserve anyway and why does the Fed get to set interest rates on credit? The Fed is a private banking cartel which holds a virtual monopoly on the setting of interest rates, and therefore on the creation and the cost of currency and credit for both our government and for all Americans.

Radio commentator and published historian Charles Moscowitz is the author of The Art and Science of American Money 
. 

Moscowitz dscusses currency in easy to understand terms, contends that the Fed bears a lion’s share of responsibility for the fact that, according to an AP report (7/28), 4 out of 5 Americans are now struggling with poverty joblessness and welfare dependency. The Fed is largely to blame for the $16 Trillion Dollar National Debt, the trade imbalance with China and the creeping inflation that is causing gas prices to go up, and is robbing the value of the workingman’s dollar. 

The role of the Fed in our economy ought to be discussed and debated as would any other political or social issue. 

Moscowitz contends that Congress, not the Fed should regulate the value of the dollar as the value of money ought to be set by elected representatives not by an unelected bureaucracy. Regarding the regulation of the value of money, the Constitution reads as follows:

Article I, Sec 8 clause 5:

The Congress shall have power to coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; 

The Art and Science of American Money – How Our Money Is Created and Why It Matters examines the history of American money and the battle between advocates of public money vs. those who supported the private debt oriented system that we now have. Many great Americans supported public money including Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy.  

The Socialist Bible-Why The Communist Manifesto Is the World’s Second Most Important Bookreveals that Karl Marx in the Communist Manifesto supported private central banking. The Communist Manifesto reads as follows:

Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.